Definition of the Limes Superior
I understand what the limes superior is insofar as I know that for example for an alternating series as $a_n = (-1)^n$ which does not diverge to $\infty$, we can define the bigger accumulation point 1 as the limes superior.
What I don't understand yet though is the corresponding notation which is:
$\sup_{n \in \mathbb N} \ \inf_{k \geq n} x_k$
I understand this so far as follows:
- I pick one concrete $n \in \mathbb N$, say n = 3.
- Then I pick the infimum of the set $\{x_3,x_4,.....x_{1000},...\}$, lets call this infimum $\inf_3$
- Next I set n = 4. And pick the infimum of the set $\{x_4,x_5,....\}$ etc.
Naturally this sequence of infima must be monotonically falling (each set of we take the infimum of is a subset of the previous set). So, of what exactly are we then taking the Supremum of? I.e. where is my understanding wrong, since such as I understand it obviously is not making much sense...thanks
$\endgroup$ 41 Answer
$\begingroup$The sequence is monotonically not decreasing, actually. Think at the sequence $(2 - 1/n)$; for $n=1$ the inf is 1, for $n=2$ is 3/2, and so on.
$\endgroup$ 5More in general
"Zoraya ter Beek, age 29, just died by assisted suicide in the Netherlands. She was physically healthy, but psychologically depressed. It's an abomination that an entire society would actively facilitate, even encourage, someone ending their own life because they had no hope. Th…"