M BUZZ CRAZE NEWS
// news

Does "triangle" in English exclude degenerate triangles?

By Gabriel Cooper
$\begingroup$

Just for fun read few problems on the projeteuler.net website.

Number 276 found interesting:

Consider the triangles with integer sides a, b and c with a ≤ b ≤ c. An integer sided triangle (a,b,c) is called primitive if gcd(a,b,c)=1. How many primitive integer sided triangles exist with a perimeter not exceeding 10 000 000?

Question:
Does the definition "triangle" in English also enforces the following condition?

a + b > c

$\endgroup$ 5

2 Answers

$\begingroup$

A CW answer to remove this question from the Unanswered queue.


Yes, "triangle" can be taken to mean "non-degenerate triangle" unless explicitly stated otherwise. As far as I know, this convention is universal.

$\endgroup$ 0 $\begingroup$

In some mathematical English, a triangle means exactly what it did 2,300 years ago:

"A triangle is plane figure bounded by three straight lines." (A Text-book of Euclid's Elements, Hall & Stevens, 1888).

This definition seems unclear.

But later, Proposition 20 clarifies it (emphasis added):

"Any two sides of a triangle are together greater than the other third side." (ibid.)

However, the articles and contradict one another: the latter includes equality.

But, I think, most (English) mathematicians would agree with the latter, and disagree with Euclid, and will allow degenerate triangles to partake in the so-called triangle inequality.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy